VILLAGE OF LONG GROVE
MEETING MINUTES OF THE ARCHITECTURAL BOARD

SPECIAL MEETING - September 12, 2005

7:00 PM

 

Call to Order:  Chairman John Staub called the meeting of the Architectural Board (AB) to order at 7:00 p.m. with the following members present:

 

Members Present:         Chairman John Staub, Lori Lyman, Dee McLaughlin, Terrance Connolly,   Lynn Michaelson-Cohn

 

Members Absent:         None

                         

Also Present:                Village Planner James Hogue

 

  1. Approval of the August 15, 2005 Draft Meeting Minutes.

 

The Board noted several minor typographical corrections to the draft meeting minutes.

 

Motion to approve the minutes as amended/corrected by Commissioner Connolly, seconded by Commissioner McLaughlin, and unanimously approved by voice vote.

 

 

2.   Consideration of a request for an addition to “The Studio”, 360 Historical Lane   for enclosure of an existing patio within the “B-1” Historic Business District,  submitted by Mr. Tom Hilligoss.

 

The AB noted that Mr. Hilligoss was not present and decided to move this item to the end of the agenda. (Note: a representative of Mr. Hilligoss did arrive at approximately 7:15 indicting that Mr. Hilligoss was delayed but would arrive in approximately 25 minutes).   

 

3.   Consideration of a request for approval of a sign for the “Long Grove Yoga Studio” within the “B-1” Historic Business District,  on property known as 347 Old McHenry Road , Submitted by Malgorzata Glinko.

    

The petitioner was present and displayed a graphic image of the proposed sign, drawn to scale, which identified the dimensions and copy to be placed on the sign.

 

The AB had questions with regard to the location of the proposed sign on the building. They felt the location indicated in the application was too high for a sign of this type. Petitioner indicated that the location in the petition was largely illustrative and not the exact location for placement of the sign.

 

The AB also had concern about the existing canopy immediately east of the Yoga Studio Building. They questioned whether that canopy could be redesigned or removed.

 

The AB requested that the proposed be placed on the north side of the building, to the left of and approximately to the top of, the first floor window.  They also suggested that the sign be suspended by an iron bracket with decorative chains, but also noted that sign could be flat mounted against the wall of the building. They also indicated that the existing name plate should remain to properly identify the entrance to the yoga studio.

 

Petitioner noted the sign would be wooden with carved raised letters.

 

Motion made by Lynn Michaelson-Cohn to accept the sign materials, copy and color scheme as presented. The sign is to be mounted on the north side of the building, to the left of and approximately to the top of, the first floor window. If the sign is to be suspended by an iron bracket with decorative chains and double faced staff shall review the same for appropriateness and shall refer back to the AB only if the bracket and chains are judged to be inappropriate. Seconded by Lori Lyman. On a voice vote all aye and none opposed.    

 

4.      Consideration of a request for approval of a sign for “Gallery Munoz” within the “B-1” Historic Business District, on property known as 247 Robert Parker Coffin Drive, Submitted by Robert L. Munoz.

 

The Board noted that there were no dimensions submitted with the proposed signage. They noted that petitioner was limited to 12 square feet of signage and one “slat sign” not to exceed 144 square inches.

 

Overall the AB liked the sign with respect to color and copy. There was some discussion of the use of vinyl on the sign.

 

A motion was made by Terry Connolly seconded by Dee McLaughlin, to accept the proposed signage as submitted with respect to copy, color and materials and subject to compliance with ordinance requirements for sign size.  On a voice vote all aye and none opposed.

 

5.   Consideration of a request for an addition to “The Studio”, 360 Historical Lane   for enclosure of an existing patio within the “B-1” Historic Business District,  submitted by Mr. Tom Hilligoss.

   

Mr. Hilligoss began with an overview of the project from the beginning of the “The Studio”. He noted the decline in business in Downtown Long Grove, especially recently, as being the catalyst for development of the restaurant. Given the age and configuration of the existing building it was felt that the expansion of the building by enclosing the patio and creating an atrium was necessary.  He had also distributed a concept for signage for the restaurant/art gallery.

 

 

 

      The AB had several questions about the proposed construction.  Most notable they discussed the pergola, the railing and architectural details of the addition. The AB favored an iron railing over a wooden one on the stairs and deck depicted on the south elevation drawing. . They liked the “New York City - Tavern on the Green” concept for the addition favoring a “conservatory” concept over an “atrium”. They indicated that this concept should be pursued and finalized so the AB had a single set of plans which clearly identified the proposal and incorporated the design features as discussed by the Board. They asked the petitioner to submit complete final plans of the proposal which they could approve.

 

      The Board noted the time constraints of the project as described by Mr. Hillligoss. While they expressed support of the conservatory concept, they determined the plans were did not demonstrate what petitioner had described.  If the petitioner can submit “final plans” the AB is willing to hold another special meeting (subject to compliance with the Open Meetings Act) to review and approve those plans in order to expedite the approval process for the petitioner.

 

      A motion was made by Lynn Michaelson-Cohn, seconded by Dee McLaughlin supporting the concept as identified by the petitioner which is to reproduce the aesthetics of the “Tavern on the Green” with the expansion subject to receiving accurate “final drawings” of the proposal including complete floor plans, a site plan and building elevations. On a voice vote the motion was unanimously approved.     

   

Mr. Hilligoss asked the Board about the concept for signage. The Board indicated that would be reviewed along with the revised plans. Planner Hogue noted the AB should review this like any other request for signage in the Historic District and limit their review to copy, materials, color scheme etc.  The numbers of signs, placement of sign and their size is beyond the scope of this Board.

 

Other Business; Commissioner McLaughlin asked as to the status of the May16th and June 20th meeting minutes. Planner Hogue indicated he would look into that matter.

 

Adjournment:  Commissioner Connolly made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Lyman.  On a voice vote the motion was unanimously approved.  Meeting adjourned at 9:23 p.m.

 

Respectfully Submitted;

 

James M. Hogue

 

James M. Hogue

Village Planner