MEETING OF THE
ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW BOARD
DECEMBER 16, 2002
1.
Call to Order: Chair John Staub called the meeting of the Architectural
Review Board to order at 7:00 p.m. with the following present:
Chair: John
Staub
Members Present: Lauren deGrazia
(arrived at 8:00 p.m.), Lori Lyman,
and Lynn Michaelson-Cohn.
Members Absent: One position
unfilled.
Also Present: Village
Manager David Lothspeich
Petitioner: Dan
O’Malley and Jim Vanderploeg
Revised Conceptual Home Design – 520-M.
In response to the Commission’s
comments from the previous meeting, the exposed area of the gable face on the
right elevation was increased to be equal to the area of the gable face on the
left elevation. Also, the addition of a
gable overlay over the two car garage door.
The Commission accepted the revisions as submitted.
Revised Conceptual Home Design
– 521-K.
In response to the Commission’s comments from the previous meeting, the position of the two car garage and one car garage was “flipped” to line up the extended roof line with the column separating the garage doors, brackets were added under all eaves, and a gable was added to the right elevation. The Commission accepted the revisions and revised concept home design as submitted.
Revised Conceptual Home Design
– 521-N.
In response to the Commission’s comments from the previous meeting, the position of the two car garage and one car garage was “flipped’ to line up the extended roof line with the column separating the garage doors. The Commission accepted the revisions and revised concept home design as submitted.
Revised Conceptual Home Design
– 522-K.
In response to the Commission’s comments from the previous meeting, the shutters were removed from the front elevation and every window was revised to incorporate 6” window wraps. The Commission accepted the revisions and revised concept home design as submitted.
Conceptual Home Design – 523-J.
Concord noted that this design was one of the few proposed footprints with garage doors and driveway court situated to the interior of the lot. During review the Commission suggested the following changes: project or “box out” the stairway window on the left elevation a minimum of 8” deep and questioned the window arrangement on the right elevation. Concord was directed to make these modifications and re-submit the plan for further review.
Conceptual Home Design – 523-L.
Following brief discussion, Commissioner Lyman moved, seconded by Commissioner Michaelson-Cohn, for conceptual approval of the preliminary home design #523-L subject to final approval of the exterior materials. On a voice vote, the motion was unanimously approved.
Conceptual Home Design – 524-K.
Following brief discussion, Commissioner Lyman moved, seconded by Commissioner Michaelson-Cohn, for conceptual approval of the preliminary home design #524-K subject to final approval of the exterior materials. On a voice vote, the motion was unanimously approved.
Conceptual Home Design – 524-N (Commissioner deGrazia arrived – 8:00 p.m.).
The Commission suggested that shutters be added to all single windows (left elevation) and that a door or window be “boxed” on the rear elevation to add dimension and that brick be added to the return on the left elevation. Commissioner Lyman moved, seconded by Commissioner Michaelson-Cohn, for conceptual approval of the preliminary home design #524-N subject to final approval of the requested revisions and exterior materials. On a voice vote, the motion was unanimously approved.
Conceptual Home Design – 525-K.
The Commission suggested that ornamentation be added around the door on the left elevation and that the front elevation element(s) be added to the left elevation. Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Michaelson-Cohn moved, seconded by Commissioner Lyman, for conceptual approval of the conceptual home design #525-K, subject to final approval of the exterior materials. On a voice vote, the motion was unanimously approved.
Conceptual Home Design – 525-N.
Following discussion, the Commission expressed concerns with how the proposed car-port and driveway configuration would function and requested that revisions be made for further review.
to adjourn the meeting. On a voice vote the motion was unanimously approved. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M.