Village of Long Grove
MEETING MINUTES OF THE
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Call to Order: Chair Pro-Tem Lynn Michaelson-Cohn called the meeting of the Architectural Review
Commission to order at
Members
Present: Lori
Lyman, Lauren DeGrazia and Lynn Michaelson-Cohn.
Members Absent: John
Staub and one position remaining unfilled.
Also Present: Village
Planner Ed Cage.
Petitioners: Jack
& Carolyn Cassidy, Michael Cantanelli & Doug Sheffen.
1.
Approval
of the
Commissioner Lyman moved, seconded by Commissioner Michaelson-Cohn,
for approval of the draft
2.
Consideration of a Request for One Two and a Half Foot
by Two and Half Foot Wall Sign and One Four Foot by One Foot Ground Sign,
Located at
The Board members
were comfortable with the colors used for the proposed sign and the overall
size of the proposed sign.
Mr.Cantanelli and Mr.Sheffen were present
to answer any specific questions the Board has on this petition.
Village Planner
Cage stated that the proposed signage complies with the sign ordinance
regulations.
Mr.Sheffen
stated that the proposed sign would replace the existing signage at this
location.
Commissioner
Degrazia moved, seconded by Commissioner Lyman, for
approval of the proposed ground sign as illustrated on the submitted drawings
using the same proposed colors. On a
voice vote, the motion was unanimously approved.
3. Consideration of a Request for
Jack & Carolyn Cassidy were present to represent the home
owners association and answer any questions the Board has on this petition.
Commissioner Michaelson-Cohn as ked
what the actual length and height was of the proposed subdivision entrance sign.
Mr.Cassidy answered that the proposed
entrance sign was illustrated at 15-feet in length and 80-inches high.
There was some discussion as to how far the proposed sign was
setback from
Mr.Cassidy will work with Village
Planner Cage to verify that the proposed sign monument is located outside of
the
Mr.Cassidy noted that the sign was
setback 28-feet from
Village Planner Cage stated that the sign itself is
a maximum size of 40-square feet which complies with the intent of the sign
ordinance. The monument structure itself is larger, as is the case for a number
of other subdivision entrance signs.
This monument structure would however, be substantially smaller than
other similar such signs.
Commissioner
Lyman moved, seconded by Commissioner DeGrazia, for
approval of the proposed subdivision entrance sign as illustrated on the
submitted drawings. On a voice vote, the
motion was unanimously approved.
4. Consideration
of a Request for One Six Foot by Six Foot Leasing Sign, Located on the Property
on the East Side of Route 83 Adjacent to the Intersection with Route 53,
Submitted by Miles Cunningham.
The petitioner was not present at the meeting.
The Board thought that request for such a sign exceeded the
maximum 6 square feet that is permitted within the sign ordinance. The Board felt that 6 square feet is the
appropriate size for a property with one street frontage and that the leasing
signage should be reviewed on a yearly basis.
Commissioner
Lyman moved, seconded by Commissioner DeGrazia, for
approval of a leasing sign that was not to exceed 6 square feet in size, and
that the approval was for a period of one year only and the petitioner would
have to resubmit a new request before the Board for such a sign after that
period had expired. On a voice vote, the
motion was unanimously approved.
5. Consideration
of a Request for One Four Foot by Two Foot Ground Sign For AtrWerks,
Located at
The petitioner was not present at the meeting.
The Board felt that the proposed sign was
appropriate for this location but had some concerns about the size of the sign
if another sign was added at this location.
Commissioner
Lyman moved, seconded by Commissioner DeGrazia, for
approval of the proposed ground sign as illustrated on the submitted drawings
and that this sign must be reduced to meet the 144 square inch requirement if
another tenant sign is added at this location.
On a voice vote, the motion was unanimously approved.
OTHER BUSINESS
There
was some discussion on the enforcement of the lighting requirements within
residential districts and that this was not being addressed.
There
was also some discussion on a proposed sign for
There
was also some discussion on the process for appointing new members to the
Board.
Adjournment: Chairman Lyman moved, seconded by Commissioner DeGrazia
to adjourn the
meeting. On a voice vote the motion was
unanimously approved. Meeting adjourned
at