MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE BOARD OF LONG GROVE

Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 8 P.M.

3110 RFD, LONG GROVE, ILLINOIS 60047-9613

 

 

CALL TO ORDER:

President Rodriguez called the meeting to order at 8:03 P.M.

 

OFFICIALS IN ATTENDANCE:

Village President:                      Rodriguez

Trustees:                                   Acuna, Barry, Hannon, Schmitt, Wachs

Trustees Absent:                       Lazakis

Village Clerk:                            Schultheis

Also Present:                            Village Manager Lothspeich, Village Superintendent Block, and Village

                                                Counsel Tappendorf 

 

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS/ITEMS FROM THE AUDIENCE:

Homeowner Associations:    

Herons Landing – David Wolfe. – No one was present. Nothing to report.

Ravenna West – Joe DiIorio. – No one was present. Nothing to report.

 

Donation: Trustee Schmitt related to the audience that the Park District received a grant from Tony and

Gwen Berg for $25,000.  The Board and the audience showed their appreciation with applause.

 

ACTION ITEMS:

Item #1:    At-Risk Agreement For Eastgate Estates Subdivision.

Mike DeMar of Fidelity Wes Builders has requested permission to begin work on the Eastgate Estates

Subdivision in advance of having the plat of subdivision recorded.  Fidelity Wes reports that their last

remaining permit needed is from Lake County Division of Transportation (LCDOT - access permit).  The

Village Board has agreed to similar requests (Long Grove Commons, Menards, etc.) subject to the property

owner agreeing to specific terms, including holding the Village harmless, through an At-risk Agreement.

Trustee Schmitt moved to approve an At-Risk Agreement between the Village of Long Grove and

Fidelity Wes to proceed with Limited Site Work For the Approved Eastgate Estates Subdivision

Conditioned upon the Submittal of the (1) Letter of Credit and (2) Signed Declaration Not to

Disconnect from Long Grove prior to Commencing Work; seconded by Trustee Hannon.

VOICE VOTE:

All ayes, no nays (Motion carried 5 – 0; Trustee Lazakis absent).

 

 

Item #2:    Resolution Reducing The Letter Of Credit For Long Grove Commons.

On May 24, 2005, the Village Board approved Ordinance #2005-O-17 “An Ordinance Approving A Final

Planned Unit Development Plat For the Long Grove Commons Development.”  As a condition for approval,

the developer posted a Letter Of Credit (LOC) in the amount of $2,388,749.59 to assure completion of all

required improvements.  The developer has since completed a significant amount of improvements and

Village Engineer Chiczewski is recommending further reduction in the amount of the LOC to $765,116.34.

Trustee Barry moved to approve a Resolution Reducing the Letter of Credit for the Long Grove

Commons from $1,519,171.03 to $765,116.34 Letter of Credit for Northeast Partners; seconded by

Trustee Schmitt.

Roll Call Vote:

Acuna – aye; Barry –aye; Hannon – aye; Lazakis – absent; Schmitt – aye; Wachs – aye.

(Motion carried 5 – 0).

 

Item #3:    Resolution Approving The Long Grove Neighborhood Traffic Management Program.

In response to the discussions during the June 22, 2007 Board Meeting, a resolution was drafted

formally accepting The Long Grove Neighborhood Traffic Management Program.  The

procedures include various notes from the Village Engineer in response to comments raised

during the June 22, 2007 Board Meeting that require further direction from the Village Board.

-         Discussion followed as per below:

Trustee Hannon noted that the percentages being suggested by the resolution asking for 30% of the residents of a subdivision being required to initiate a study by the Village Engineer; and then subsequently requiring 85% approval of residents in the area affected by the traffic calming solutions put forth by the Engineer would be prohibitive to any action being taken.  She further stated that in the case of the speed tables on Schaeffer Road, the required percentages of approval would literally need 100% approval as there were only four homes affected (meaning that even one disapproving resident could stop the traffic calming from going through).  Trustee Hannon also pointed out that requiring residents to “buy into” the solutions by paying $500 each might mean that a very small percentage of residents would be paying for traffic calming solutions that were benefiting a much larger group of residents and even other subdivisions.

 

President Rodriguez stated that the Board was not approving the document just the concept.  Trustees agreed that this was a great procedural idea but were unclear as to what areas should be considered the impacted areas and what percentages should be used to determine implementation of studies and solutions.

 

Trustee Wachs suggested some sort of point system to prioritize the picking of projects; and weighting those projects by the number of people affected by the traffic calming solutions and the contiguous streets affected.

 

Trustee Acuna said that there was a potential dilemma in making the procedures too complicated or with too many terms and conditions.  He also added that there is the hope that there will be national safety standards within 1 ½ years.

 

Village Counsel Tappendorf stated that she had a question regarding Step #5 – an approval vote of 85% of the residents to do the project and Step #6 – Village Engineer implements the project; there needed to be a Step added regarding Village Board approval for expenditures for a particular traffic project.  Trustees agreed to the added wording.

 

Resident Susan Klein said that she believed that the Village Board needed to educate residents on the process being suggested so they fully understood their options.

 

Due to the amount of changes being offered, Trustees decided not to vote on the resolution and tabled it to the next meeting. – No motion was made.

 

Item #4:    Ordinance Establishing Construction Standards In Public ROW.

As a follow-up to discussions during the June 8, 2007 Board Meeting Re: AT&T Project Lightspeed, the

ordinance would adopt the Illinois Municipal League (IML) model ordinance establishing construction

standards within public right of way.

Village Manger Lothspeich stated that the interim measure would enhance what already exists.

Trustee Acuna moved to approve an ordinance amending Chapter 4 of the Long Grove Village Code to

Establish Standards for the Construction of Facilities in the Public Rights of Way including language

allowing The Village of Long Grove to determine approval of any construction; seconded by Trustee

Barry.  

Roll Call Vote:

Acuna – aye; Barry –aye; Hannon – aye; Lazakis – absent; Schmitt – aye; Wachs – aye.

(Motion carried 5 – 0).

 

Item #5:    Ordinance Amending Building Code Re: Construction Fencing.

In response to the on-going concerns for safety related to the continued work stoppage for The Studio Of

Long Grove, Village Superintendent Bob Block has been attempting to reach property owner Tom Hilligoss

to install temporary chain link fence around the perimeter of the construction.  In addition, Staff had

previously directed Village Counsel to review the current Building Code to determine whether the Village

had sufficient authority to require temporary chain link construction fencing and to prepare an amendment, if

needed.  

Superintendent Block stated that this ordinance would allow him to request the most suitable construction

Fencing and give him the authority to issue a stop work order to anyone who did not comply.

Trustee Schmitt moved to approve an Ordinance Amending The Building Code RE: Construction

Fencing; seconded by Trustee Wachs.

Roll Call Vote:

Acuna – aye; Barry –aye; Hannon – aye; Lazakis – absent; Schmitt – aye; Wachs – aye.

(Motion carried 5 – 0).

 

Resident Vernadine Martlock said that the Village must not allow the orange fencing, because it does not

hold up.  She said that other Villages use chain link fencing. Superintendent Block noted that this ordinance

would allow him to determine the height and the fencing that was required.  He said that the Village would

require cyclone fencing.

 

Item #6:    Village President Rodriguez.

Nothing to report.  No action was taken.

 

Item #7:    Village Trustee Acuna.

Lake County Department of Transportation – Trustee Acuna reported that he had attended a meeting on the

previous Thursday. – No action was taken.

 

Item #8:    Village Trustee Barry.

Pathway Presentation – Trustee Barry reported that the presentation to the Park District received a great deal

of support. – No action was taken.

 

 

 

 

Item #9:    Village Trustee Hannon.

A.  Treasurer Report For June 30, 2007. Trustee Hannon moved to approve the Treasurer’s Report;p

seconded by Trustee Schmitt.

Roll Call Vote:

Acuna – aye; Barry –aye; Hannon – aye; Lazakis – absent; Schmitt – aye; Wachs – aye.

(Motion carried 5 – 0).

 

Trustee Hannon moved to approve the balance and payment of the bills; seconded by Trustee Barry.

Roll Call Vote:

Acuna – aye; Barry –aye; Hannon – aye; Lazakis – absent; Schmitt – aye; Wachs – aye.

(Motion carried 5 – 0).

                 

B.  Actual and Budget Comparisons For Period Ending June 30, 2007.   – No action was taken.

                 

Item #10:  Village Trustee Lazakis.

Absent.    

 

Item #11:  Trustee Schmitt.

Park District Liaison – Trustee Schmitt stated that funding was discussed during this meeting. – No action was taken

The Bridge – Trustee Schmitt stated that The Bridge was on schedule. She said that it would include Police statistics. – No action was taken.

 

Item #12:  Village Trustee Wachs.

Fire Department Meeting – Trustee Wachs said that the Village’s Emergency Plan needed to be updated as it

was ten years old.  He also said that the Fire Code for the Commercial District needed to be brought up to the

2006 Code, but that this would apply only to new structures, not existing.

Trustee Wachs said that the Village has signed on to the NIMS (National Incident Management System), and

that our CERT team has 25 trained members that could be called upon in an emergency.  With more training,

they could be at the Tier II level where they could volunteer to go out and help – No action was taken.

 

Security – Trustee Wachs said that there would be a Radar Trailer on 53 Eastbound the upcoming week and

then on Schaeffer Road.  Trustees thought that this might enable the Board to see how traffic reacts to a traffic

calming device such as the radar trailer. – No action was taken.

 

Item #13:  Village Clerk Schultheis.

Nothing to report.  No action was taken.

 

Item #14:  Village Manager Lothspeich.

Nothing to report. No action was taken.

 

Item #15:  Village Superintendent Block.

New Homes Permits – Superintendent Block stated that new homes permits were down, but that other types of

permits were on the rise.  He said that builders were not building spec homes, and hence the decrease in new

home permits. – No action was taken.

 

 

 

 

Item #16:  Village Planner Hogue.

Not present. No action was taken.

 

Item #17:  Village Attorney Tappendorf

Zoning Code -   Trustee Acuna had asked the status of the Zoning Code as it regarded Bulk.  Village Counsel Tappendorf stated that there would be a document presented at the July 24, 2007 meeting. – No  action was taken.

 

Item #18:  Approval of Board Meeting Minutes.

June 12, 2007 Minutes. – Trustee Barry moved to approve the Minutes as amended; seconded by

Trustee Hannon.

VOICE VOTE:

All ayes, No  nays (Motion carried 5 – 0; Trustee Lazakis absent)

 

June 26, 2007 Minutes.  - Continued.

 

Item:         Executive Session.

At 9:13 P.M.; Trustee Hannon moved to go into Executive Session to discuss (1) Executive Session

Minutes; (2) Litigation; and (3) Acquisition and Disposition of Property; seconded by Trustee

Barry.

Roll Call Vote:

Acuna – aye; Barry –aye; Hannon – aye; Lazakis – absent; Schmitt – aye; Wachs – aye.

(Motion carried 5 – 0).

 

Item:  Other Business.

June 26, 2007 Executive Session Meeting Minutes – Continued.

 

Item:  Adjournment.

At 10:15 P.M., Trustee Barry moved to adjourn the meeting; seconded by Trustee Hannon.

VOICE VOTE:

All ayes, no nays (Motion carried  5 – 0; Trustee Lazakis absent).